In closely held companies, disputes may arise over whether owner-executive compensation reflects services or diverts value from other owners. Market-supported compensation analysis can help assess the economic evidence. It does not by itself resolve oppression, fiduciary-duty, contract or unjust-enrichment claims; counsel determines the governing legal standards.
When counsel retain us
We provide independent compensation analysis for plaintiff and defense counsel, as testifying experts, non-testifying consulting experts, or rebuttal experts within the agreed engagement. Privilege and work-product protection depend on the governing law, purpose and circumstances; neither counsel involvement nor a consulting designation guarantees protection. Counsel determines the applicable disclosure requirements, and the expert retains responsibility for independent findings.
How the opinion is built
The analysis compares the executive’s actual roles with relevant market evidence, explaining comparability, adjustments and limitations. Where appropriate, investor returns provide additional economic context. A tax-law independent-investor test is not a universal rule for shareholder liability. Any difference between supported and actual pay is evaluated within the assignment; reports and testimony depend on the agreed scope.
If this question is live in a matter you are handling, request a conflicts check — an initial conversation costs nothing and quickly clarifies whether an independent compensation expert strengthens your case. Our methodology and engagement structures pages explain how we work.
This material is general educational information, not legal or tax advice for a particular matter. Requirements vary by jurisdiction and can change. Counsel and tax advisers should verify the governing rules. No tax treatment, privilege, admissibility or case outcome is guaranteed. An inquiry does not create an engagement.